The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to assessment practices in higher education settings where many institutions have opted to use exam surveillance software to replace invigilated, in person exams.

The use of this kind of software brings longstanding concerns about the validity, fairness, and equity of assessment practices more sharply into focus.

In this forum, we will explore the use of surveillance software in order to advance conversations and prompt renewed attention to assessment in higher education, including privacy and broader issues of student’s rights.

We have invited four panelists to share their knowledge: Kristin Smith, representative from the University of Manitoba Students’ Union, will share her experience responding to the use of surveillance software; Dr. Neil McArthur will discuss the ethical implications of exam software; Fred Zinn will continue the conversation raising issues of equity and offering meaningful assessment alternatives; Dr. Dustin Louie will share his experiences decolonizing assessment practices in university courses.

After the panelists have spoken, there will be time for dialogue.

The forum will be conducted through Zoom, Feb. 24, 6:30–8 p.m. (CST).

While there is no cost to attend, attendees will need to pre-register in order to receive the Zoom link.