Reviewing Reviewing #2

Systemic design sessions and symposia are hosted and run by independently organised groups.

Systemic Design Association

Cybersystemic perspectives and identifiable moments of serendipity

Relating Systems Thinking & Design

RSDX is a between symposium space for systemic design inquiry.

A conversation with Ray Ison, Houda Khayame, and Wendy Ross | Hosted by Ryan MurphyThis hour-long conversation is concentrated on how to review submissions for conferences and journals. The second half of the session is AMA—bring your curiosity, stories, pragmatism, and proverbial red pen.These sessions are an opportunity to consider a range of topics, such as how reviewing is positioned in an academic career path and how it contributes to research and praxis. The sessions are recorded and aim to represent various perspectives and answer questions for people new to reviewing while offering fresh insights for established reviewers and editors.An undercurrent for these sessions is acknowledging that academic norms are culturally and institutionally reinforced—and sometimes ripe for revisiting and questioning. The conversations start with points of view from some experienced and emerging reviewers on reviewing and then open to participants in an ask-me-anything (AMA) format.For academics and practitioners, reviewing engagements are a way to offer authors professional experience and share domain knowledge through single- or double-anonymous review notes. The reviewing payback is the continuous improvement of writing and editing skills and expanded knowledge through exposure to new research. Topics related to reviewing extend to the (re)definition of scholarly practices, the role of metrics and researcher assessments, and barriers that limit the participation of early career researchers and practitioners. Although these issues will likely surface in the sessions, the primary goal is to throw the gate open and discuss what it means to review, who should review, and consider best practices.For anyone new to reviewing or reviewing-curious, you are invited to think of these sessions as part of a developmental process. When you are getting started, you have the benefit of rules and procedural guidelines and can steadily advance these by applying them to a variety of cases. Reviewing reviewing this way can make it less daunting and help you connect with opportunities and participate in publishing communities.Discussant profiles<a href="https://rsdsymposium.org/reviewing-reviewing/" title="https://rsdsymposium.org/reviewing-reviewing/" target="_blank" data-msys-clicktrack="0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"> https://rsdsymposium.org/reviewing-reviewing/</a>

Our {communityGuidelinesLink} describe the sort of content we prohibit on Eventbrite. If you suspect an event may be in violation, you can report it to us so we can investigate.

To report other categories of prohibited or illegal content, submit {link}

Reviewing Reviewing #2

More events from Systemic Design Association

Discover more events from Systemic Design Association, from Business to other experiences you might love.

Still looking for the right event?

Explore all online events to browse and filter by date, category, and more.

Reviewing Reviewing #2

More events from Systemic Design Association

Discover more events from Systemic Design Association, from Business to other experiences you might love.

You might also like...

Browse more events with different dates, prices, and formats to find your next great experience.

Still looking for the right event?

Explore all online events to browse and filter by date, category, and more.